The need
Why I created it
I created this method to compare the full cost of a delivery choice rather than treating speed or hourly price as the whole answer.
Decision and Cost Clarity
A decision method for comparing whether work should be done by AI, human effort, automation, or a hybrid approach based on cost, time, quality, and risk.
Work is assigned to the approach that creates the strongest responsible value, not merely the lowest visible price.
A familiar situation
The cheapest-looking way to complete a task can become expensive when review time, errors, trust, maintenance, or rework are ignored.
What this method is
A decision method for comparing whether work should be done by AI, human effort, automation, or a hybrid approach based on cost, time, quality, and risk.
The need
I created this method to compare the full cost of a delivery choice rather than treating speed or hourly price as the whole answer.
The function
It considers effort, tool cost, review burden, reliability, judgement, sensitivity, learning value, reversibility, and long-term maintenance.
Practical value
It gives decision-makers a calmer way to choose between human, AI, automation, and hybrid delivery.
The working rhythm
Define the outcome and quality bar.
Estimate human effort.
Estimate AI and automation effort.
Add review, risk, and maintenance cost.
Compare realistic options.
Choose and record the rationale.
The distinction
Quality, risk, and hidden review time are treated as real costs, not footnotes.
What improves
Work is assigned to the approach that creates the strongest responsible value, not merely the lowest visible price.
Useful contexts
Continue the thought
If you are working through content production, we can discuss whether this method offers a useful way to frame the next step.